In 2000 an agreement was signed between Australia and New
Zealand which sought to facilitate the recognition and enforcement of child
support decisions between the two countries.
A fundamental premise of the agreement is that while child
support assessments, liabilities and orders of one country can be subject to
applications in the other country, any orders made in the second country can
only become binding if endorsed by the originating country.
The recent decision by the Full Court of the Family Court in
Child Support Registrar & Higgins
[2016] confirmed this.
In this matter the mother, a New Zealander, had obtained a
child support assessment from the relevant New Zealand agency. The Australian
father subsequently sought an order from the Federal Circuit Court here that
the assessment be dismissed or that it was unenforceable. Orders were made by
the Court stopping the enforcement of the assessment. The New Zealand agency
advised the father that the orders were not acceptable as only a New Zealand
court could make such a final order. The New Zealand agency subsequently lodged
the assessment with the Australian agency for collection. The Australian agency
then became involved in proceedings and appealed the orders that had been made
on the basis that they were unenforceable.
The Appeal was wholly successful and the Court confirmed the principles of the 2000 agreement.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteWhat are some websites that I can look up free criminal records in texas?
ReplyDeletepublic records
This is really informative post for everyone and I really appreciate your work and this post will help many who wants legal help. Keep it up...
ReplyDeleteChild Support Lawyer
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteNice Blog!!! Thanks for sharing the blog and good information and keep updating the blogs.
ReplyDeleteFamily Lawyers Northern Beaches